Geothermobarometry, metamorphic
processes

Gerya T.V., Perchuk L.L., Podlesskii K.K., and Kosyakova N.A. Thermodynamic data base for the system: MgO-FeO-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2.

key words [date base thermodynamic constant mineral ]

Standard thermodynamic properties of individual substances and mixing functions of solid solutions in the system MgO-FeO-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 were brought

25


into consistence by the non-linear least-squares method. We used published data on phase equilibria and measurements of physical properties of minerals. Cyclic data treatment was performed with systematic control over the reproducibility of experimental P and T values and compositions of equilibrated phases. Such a procedure made it possible to describe a great body of experimental data (more than 5000 data points) within the limits of experimental errors.

The algorithm is based on the GibbsÆs free-energy equation, which describes a solid (mineral) as a system of quantum oscillators tied by forces of potential interaction. Each oscillator was assumed to have the infinite number of energy levels, according to the Bose-Einstein statistics. By analogy with the Lennard-Jones potential, the repulsive force between the oscillators was assumed to be proportional to the 12th degree of the average distance between them. The gravitational forces are characterized by average inner pressure, which is opposite in sign to the repulsive force. The optimal form of the equation includes nine refinable parameters:

G(cal/mol)=Ho-T × So+K1 × RTln[1-exp(-G1/RT)]+K2 × RTln[1-exp(-H2/RT)]+A × [(P1+P)0.8-(P1+1)0.8], (1)

where G1=H1+A1 × [(P1+P)0.8-(P1+1)0.8], H0 and S0 are, respectively, enthalpy of formation and configuration entropy of a given mineral at T = 0 K and P = 1 bar; K1 and K2 are the numbers of oscillators in the mineral molecule multiplied by the number of degrees of freedom of one oscillator for low- and high-energy transitions, respectively; H1 and H2 are differences in enthalpy of adjacent energy levels for low- and high-energy transitions, respectively; A1 and A2 are respectively average parameter of repulsive potential between the oscillators and the change of this parameter for low-energy transitions; P1 is average inner pressure, which characterizes the gravitation between the oscillators; T is temperature (K); P is pressure (bar); R = 1.987 cal/mol/K - universal gas constant. Equation (1) properly describes physical properties of substances and provides good extrapolation. Table 1 presents calculated values of the constants for Equation (1).

The following models for molar mixing energies of solid solutions were accepted (Gm at the parameters of the modeling W = WH-TWS+(P-1) WV. cal/mol).

Orthopyroxene (Opx) in the system En-OK-Fs-Wol

Gm=RT[(1-XCa)ln(1-XCa)+XCaln(XCa)]/2+RT[(1-XAl)ln(1-XAl) + XAlln(XAl)]/2 + RT[(XMgln(XMg) + (1-XMg)ln(1-XMg)]*
*(1-XOK-XWol) + XMg(1-XCa)XCa[W7+W8(1-2XCa)]/2+(1-XMg)(1-XCa)XCa[W11+ W12(1-2XCa)]/2+XMg(1-XAl)XAl[W1+W2(1-2XAl)]/2+ (1-XMg)(1-XAl)XAl[W5+W6(1-2XAl)]/2+(1-XOK-XWol)XMg(1-XMg)[W3 +W4(2XMg-1)] + XWolXOK [W9+W10(XWol - XOK)],

where XCa=2XWol; XAl=2XOK; XMg=XEn/(XEn+XFs); XEn=Mg/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2);

XOK=Al/2/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2); XFs=Fe/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2);

XWol =Ca/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2).

Garnet (Grt) in the system Prp-Alm-Grs

Gm=3RT[XPrpln(XPrp)+XAlmln(XAlm)+XGrsln(XGrs)]+3XPrpXAlmW1+3XPrpXGrs[W3+ W4(XPrp-XGrs)]+3XAlmXGrs[W5+W6(XAlm-XGrs)] + 3XPrpXAlmXGrsW7,

where XPrp=Mg/(Mg+Fe+Ca); XAlm=Fe/(Mg+Fe+Ca); XGrs=Ca/(Mg+Fe+Ca).

Cordierite (Crd) in the system Crm-Crf

Gm=2RT[XCrmln(XCrm)+XCrfln(XCrf)]+k, where k = W1 in aqueous system and k = 0 in dry system;

XCrm=Mg/(Mg+Fe); XCrf=Fe/(Mg+Fe).

Spinel (Spl) in the system Spm-Her

Gm=RT[XSpmln(XSpm)+XHerln(XHer)]+XSpmXHer[W1+W2(XSpm-XHre)],where XSpm=Mg/(Mg+fe); XHer=Fe/(Mg+Fe).

Olivine (Ol) in the system Fo-Fa:

Gm=2RT[XFoln(XFo)+XFaln(XFa)]+XFoXFaW1, where XFo=Mg/(Mg+Fe) ˆ XFa=Fe/(Mg+Fe).

Sapphirine (Spr) in the system SS-SA

26


Gm=RT[XSSln(XSS)+XSAln(XSA)], where XSS=6Si/(Si+Al/2)-1; XSA=1-XSS.

Clinopyroxene (Cpx) in the system CEn-CK-CFs-CW

Gm=RT[(1-XCa)ln(1-XCa)+XCaln(XCa)]/2+RT[(1-XAl)ln(1-XAl)+ XAlln(XAl)]/2+RT[(XMgln(XMg)+
(1-XMg)ln(1-XMg)](1-XCK-XCWo)+ X2Mg(1-XCa)XCa[W7+W8(1-2XCa)]/2+ (1-X2Mg)(1-XCa)XCa[W11+ W12(1-2XCa)]/2+ XMg(1-XAl)XAl[W1+W2(1-2XAl)]/2+ (1-XMg)(1-XAl)XAl[W5+W6(1-2XAl)]/2+ (1-XCK-XCWo)XMg(1-XMg)[W3 + W4(2XMg-1)]+ XMg(0.5-XCWo)XCK[W9+X10(0.5-XCWo-XCK)]+ (1-XMg)(0.5-XCWo)XCKW16,

where XCa=2XCWo; XAl=2XCK; XMg=XCEn/(XCEn+XCFs); XCEn=Mg/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2);

XCK=Al/2/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2); XCFs=Fe/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2);

XCWo=Ca/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Al/2).

Table 1. Calculated parameters of equation (1) for individual substances

Mineral

Formula

Ho

So

K1

H1

A

P1

A1

K2

H2

QzbSiO2-2183884.6217.92213186.2761669430.000001.0834573
QzaSiO2-2189503.9797.97113265.132765370.012111.0684752
CoeSiO2-2183022.9427.78312475.6411968400.005581.5465251
CrnAl2O3-4023181.99215.03314318.4945228820.011841.8937399
SilAl2SiO5-6209946.50522.367134814.0982329090.005954.0946245
KyAl2SiO5-6225384.64523.329143112.5672420830.012673.6717121
AnCaAl2Si2O8-101730416.48536.454126226.5101630640.007557.4336342
EnMgSiO3-3718303.70414.28912708.9992547610.013622.8695935
OKAl2O3-4020342.08814.88914099.2854512790.009882.0266673
FsFeSiO3-2883289.12914.04511268.9111886780.014633.1934986
WolCaSiO3-3917496.77114.336119611.2522356790.013501.9565591
PrpMg3Al2Si3O12-151081617.76557.009129134.1323229370.010888.3825943
AlmFe3Al2Si3O12-127223623.94153.873109234.7893260510.0085211.5514268
GrsCa3Al2Si3O12-158893615.93657.314127437.7823219770.011266.3064910
CrmMg2Al4Si5O18-220213934.88680.464131361.1811600080.0026016.3156809
CrfFe2Al4Si5O18-203196845.50380.585126662.2871606390.0026916.9626399
SpmMgAl2O4-5523964.71920.767132912.5394045700.011963.6716894
HerFeAl2O4-4704859.65020.637121912.7223844050.009933.9625444
FoMg2SiO4-5222455.55620.007122912.4962508640.015664.2206805
FaFe2SiO4-35783315.70721.461115013.1962455340.013073.8556387
SSSi2Al8Mg4O20-265047922.80499.672132864.8814777810.0119715.0805425
SASiAl10Mg3O20-268349616.66897.855129561.2353752370.0102916.8835133
CEnMgSiO3-3715684.17814.07812718.8332274450.013872.9615662
CKAl2O3-3965183.51314.49813528.0602212660.006122.8295568
CFsFeSiO3-2884148.71814.39811359.0201946900.014184.0355991
CWoCaSiO3-3957386.38114.22211959.7782306010.017121.5714823

Calculated mixing parameters for the above-listed solid solution models are given in Table 2.

Conventional symbols: Qzb - quartz, Qza - quartz, Coe - coesite, Crn - corundum, Sil - sillimanite, Ky - kyanite, An - anorthite, En - enstatite, OK - orthopyroxene AlAlO3, Fs - ferrosillite, Wol - CaSiO3 with enstatite structure, Prp - pyrope, Alm - almandine, Grs - grossular, Crm - magnesian cordierite, Crf - ferrous cordierite, Spm - spinel, Her - hercynite, Fo - forsterite, Fa - fayalite, SS - siliceous sapphirine, SA - aluminous sapphirine, CEn - enstatite with diopside structure, CFs - ferrosillite with diopside structure, CWo - wollastonite with Ca-clinopyroxene structure, CK - clinopyroxene AlAlO3.

OK, Wol, CEn, CK, CK, CFs, CWo exist only as conventional end members of pyroxene solid solutions.

Table 2. Calculated mixing parameters for solid solutions

27


Mineral W WH WS WV Mineral W WH WS WV

Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Opx
Grt
Grt
Grt
Grt
Grt
Grt

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
3
4
5
6
7

12806.1
-3122.3
-408.8
372.8
2317.3
3288.7
1706.6
4675.7
2551.1
-6856.0
515.5
883.9
82.2
852.9
661.0
374.6
41.6
-90.1

5.5274
-0.4859
-0.4419
0.4406
0.5468
-0.0583
0.0123
0.0087
-0.0316
0.3530
0.0000
0.0000
0.0125
-1.0973
0.0275
0.6993
0.0265
-0.5163

-0.01802
-0.01373
0.00000
0.00000
-0.03479
-0.18560
-0.11117
0.01465
0.00000
0.00000
-0.09295
0.00067
0.00000
0.00826
-0.00905
0.00771
0.00236
-0.00579

Crd
Spl
Spl
Ol
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx
Cpx

1
1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
16

-2414.0
631.8
-171.4
1044.3
914.9
1801.1
-884.2
-234.2
2275.2
337.7
9538.5
2124.7
-830.3
-444.6
3221.9
322.5
-20328.7

-1.9560
-0.0647
0.0688
0.0699
0.0496
0.0448
-0.9489
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.6364
0.8016
0.0507
0.0042
-1.1580
0.0001
0.2806

-0.37228
0.00000
0.00000
0.00313
-0.03374
-0.03827
0.00000
0.00000
-0.01890
-0.02349
0.00560
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000


Chashchukhin I.S., Votyakov S.L., and Uimin S.G. Oxithermobarometry of the Ural chromite-bearing ultramafites.

key words [chrom-spinellid oxithermobarometry ultramatites]

As evidenced by the nuclear gamma-resonance and microprobe data on 25 chrom-spinellid samples from ultramafic rocks of the Urals and various literature data, the deviation from stoichiometric composition is typical of this mineral. The degree of this deviation, characterized by the Me2+/Me3+ ratio, is controlled by the chemical composition of the mineral and the conditions of formation and subsequent alteration of the ultramafites, but does not depend on formational affinity of the rocks. The deviation from stoichiometric composition and the fraction of minor elements incorporated in the mineral structure (especially titanium) have significant effect on the temperature estimates for the olivine-chrom-spinellid equilibrium. In this connection the well-known geothermometers (Jackson-Reder, Fabri, Ono, and O'Neil-Bolhauz) were corrected to bring the calculated temperature values into consistence with geologcal and pyroxene geothermometry data.

The oxidation state of rocks of the largest Ural ultramafic massifs - Kempirsai, Nurali, Yuzhnokrakinsk (South Urals), Voikaro-Syn'inskii (Polar Urals), and Nizhnetagil'skii (Middle Urals) - was studied. Oxygen fugacities were calculated by Nell-Wood and Bolhauz-Berry-Green's oxybarometers. When the true (Mossbauer) oxidation state of iron in chrom-spinellid is taken into account, the difference between the fO2 values offered by these oxybarome -

ters is constant. The secondary standards were used to determine correctly the Fe3+ content in spinellid. A total of 378 samples were analyzed.

The oxygen fugacity was found to vary widely relative to FMQ buffer (from -2.0 to +3.0 log units). This fact can be explained by superposition of two processes: magmatic depletion of the upper mantle at decreasing oxygen fugacity and subsequent metasomatism at increasing oxygen fugacity. From the present studies and literature data, four states of oxidation of the fold-zone ultramafites were distinguished:

(a) asthenosphere (dlogfO2FMQ<-1.0);
(b) oceanic lithosphere (-1.0<dlogfO2FMQ<0);
(c) transition from the oceanic to continental lithosphere (0 <dlogfO2FMQ<+2.0), and
(d) continental lithosphere (flogfO2 > +2.0).

Evidently, the oxygen fugacity in ultramafites is indicative of the preservation of the original asthenospheric oxidation state of the rocks and the degree of subsequent lithospheric transformations rather than the lateral heterogeneity of the mantle. Accretion played a significant part in the formation of Ural ultramafic massifs, as evidenced by the occurrence of the rock blocks characterized by different oxygen fugacities within a massif. The oxygen behavior was shown to differ in the formation of high-chromium and high-alumina chromite ores as a result of changes in tectonic regime. Consequently, the ore-forming fluids also had different compositions: the first low-oxygen fluid flow (below FMQ buffer), with stable graphite and high methane and CO mole fractions, and the second high-oxygen fluid flow (above FMQ buffer), with graphite unstable and high carbon dioxide mole fraction.

28


Poltavets Yu.A. Thermodynamic analysis of stability of magnetite-series spinelides under conditions of abyssal petrogenesis.

key words [magnetite spinel thermodynamic analysis]

The concept of zonal structure of the earthÆs crust and upper mantle is now a common knowledge. Structural and geochemical characteristics of main rock-forming minerals, including oxides, are indicators of depth (pressure). Unfortunately, data on compositions of these minerals are of little practical use because of lack of experimental and thermodynamic studies of these minerals at high temperatures and pressures. Thus, the problem of thermodynamic stability of magnetite-series spinelides at temperatures and pressures corresponding to the lower horizons of the earthÆs crust and upper mantle still remains slightly understood and poorly reported in literature.

The diagram in figure was drawn on the basis of thermodynamic and statistic analyses of published experimental data on compositions of Fe-oxides and Fe-silicates and shows the stability fields of the end members of magnetite-series spinellid solid solutions. Compared to the scheme of depth facies for Ti-rich rocks, which is used by some authors (Sobolev et al., 1975), the proposed diagram is more detailed and provides distinguishing the thermodynamic stability fields of Fe-oxides (magnetite-series spinellides) on the basis of their compositions. This diagram also shows the relationship between pyrope and almandine end members in the high-pressure garnets calculated by regression analysis.

From the diagram, a vertical zoning is expected for the magnetite-series spinellides within the depth range corresponding to the lower crust and upper mantle. This zoning manifests itself in decreasing trivalent ions (Fe3+, Al3+, Cr3+) and Mg2+ and increasing titanium content of the Fe-oxides. Statistic data processing confirms this assumption: Ti4+ and Fe2+ show positive correlation with pressure (depth) (0.53 and 0.88 respectively), while Mg2+, Fe3+, and Al3+ show negative correlation (-0.64, -0.59, and -0.32 respectively). Thus, the degree of reduction of Fe-oxides increases with depth of magnetite-series spinellid formation (correlation factor between Fe3+/Fe and pressure is equal to -0.68). The following zonal series is proposed: MgFe2O4-(Mg,Fe)(Al,Cr)2O4-FeAl2O4-(FeCr2O4+Fe2TiO4) - FeTiO3.

The correlation of facies and subfacies after Sobolev et al. (the first two columns) with the terms accepted in this study is given left of the diagram: CA - diamond, CG - graphite, QK - coesite, Q - quartz, Ru - rutile, Il - ilmenite, Usp - ulvospinel, SpTi,Cr,Al,Mg - Fe2TiO4, FeCr2O4, Fe(Mg)Al2O4 respectively, Pl - plagioclase, Gr<1, 1-4,>4 - garnets with pyrope/almandine ratio <1, within 1-4, and >4 respectively, PxFe,Mg-Fe- and Mg-rich pyroxenes respectively, Ol - olivine.

Figure. Scheme of depth facies and stability fields of magnetite-series spinellides.

(1-3) granite layer (o = 2.75 g/cm3), basalt layer (o = 2.85 g/cm3), and mantle (o = 3.3 g/cm3); (4) solidus field for magmas of various composition (from tholeiite to alkaline); (5) oceanic geotherm (Ringwood, 1981); (6) contours of equal contents of pyrope (Pyr) and almandine (Alm) end members in high-pressure garnets; (7) metamorphic facies after V.S. Sobolev et al (Abyssal xenoliths ..., 1975), etc. From the top to the bottom: spinel-pyroxene (ilmenite-spinel), grospidite (ilmenite-rutile-pyrope), and coesite facies.

29


References:

  1. Abyssal xenoliths and upper mantle (1975) Novosibirsk, Nauka, p. 271.
  2. Dobretsov N.A. Introduction to global petrology. (1980) Novosibirsk, Nauka, p; 200.
  3. Ringwood A.E. (1981) Composition and petrology of the earth's mantle. Moscow, Nauka, p. 584.

30


Previous Contents Next